I’ve been in the Lineker defence business for ages. As usual, what his critics are singling out is not what they really hate
I’ve been in the Gary Lineker defence business for ages, since way before it was cool. In 2017, the Daily Mail attempted a hit job on his tax affairs – one of the laziest drive-bys in tabloid history, nothing but innuendo and guesswork. Arguably, it would have been better to ignore it, as there was nothing really to see. Besides, he’s no wallflower, Lineker, and hardly lacked a platform of his own. But it seemed important because the rightwing press was using confected disapproval as a deterrent; they didn’t really care whether he paid tax or not. They don’t even like tax. They just wanted to discredit his progressive credentials, to quell the leftish things he said, which were then, as now, mostly related to the treatment of refugees. If, in the process, they could corrode the unity of the wokerati, buttress the proposition that you have to be poor to be on the left (and you’ll never be quite poor enough) and make any other public figure think twice before skating anywhere near a humane point of view, all the better. I never thought Lineker’s reputation was under any threat, but I chimed in anyway, like a kazoo watching an orchestra and deciding it needed a bit of extra help.
This current row is not about any of the things it purports to be about: it’s not about the BBC’s rules on impartiality, which are wildly incoherent and, even if they made internal sense, wouldn’t apply to Gary Lineker anyway. It’s not about what you are and aren’t allowed to compare to 1930s Germany, and who is qualified to police those comparisons.
Zoe Williams is a Guardian columnist
Continue reading...from The Guardian https://ift.tt/oSUcKgW
0 comments:
Post a Comment